Jump to content


Photo

Why would anyone...


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Dennis Hilborn

Dennis Hilborn

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts
  • LocationDFW Texas

Posted 22 October 2018 - 06:46 AM

Why would anyone draw elevations from scratch in SP2018?  I saw a video on youtube and the poster was doing just that.  Maybe just to show that it can be done?

Here's a link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lakR3XUFikI&spfreload=10


  • Brent Hyndman likes this

#2 Yvon Gonthier

Yvon Gonthier

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,288 posts
  • LocationOttawa

Posted 22 October 2018 - 09:30 AM

Some people have the CAD mentality and can't get away from it. We've hired companies in the past and I was amazed and frustrated that they wouldn't take advantage of any of Softplan's strengths. Even for a simple design, they had no floors drawn. Even if you don't want an exact layout, take 5 seconds to draw a floor system so your walls adjust and you have something to start with for your sections.


  • Brent Hyndman and Stephan Page like this

#3 Sam Morgan

Sam Morgan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 851 posts

Posted 22 October 2018 - 09:39 PM

You can ask the original Youtube poster.  I think Brian is a regular here.



#4 Joseph Smith

Joseph Smith

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 824 posts
  • LocationWI

Posted 24 October 2018 - 09:17 PM

I couldn't do it....to each his own I say.

 

Attached Files

  • Attached File  q4 1.jpg   144.92KB   0 downloads

  • Ron Mejeur and D M like this

Joseph A. Smith

http://granitedesigngroup.com

 


#5 Brian Berzinskis

Brian Berzinskis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 470 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 04 December 2018 - 08:04 AM

So yes that is the way that I still do it. Main reason why is because it is much faster for me to create all of the details that I want than it is to build it in 3D. Typically I would say that I spend less than 45 minutes creating all of the elevations and details that I need on the exterior. By the time I go through all of the floor plans editing the wall heights and materials and exterior elements that I want to include, I just have not had it at a point where I can do it as quickly. Maybe if I continued to work in the 3D model more often it would come faster over time but that has not been the case for me to get the looks that I have wanted at a fast pace. I am always open to suggestions and changing but this has just been much more efficient for me over time. 



#6 Kevin Rabenaldt

Kevin Rabenaldt

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 391 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio

Posted 04 December 2018 - 12:23 PM

Setting wall heights and beam heights is very simple and not time consuming.  From there you can generate many other things, most notably the roof.  The accuracy is what is important to me in generating elevations.  I also use the model to make sure there are not problems for construction.  I also have to provide "full" framing plans, with proper and actual joists, and rafters, not just call outs..  But if other methods work for getting to the same place, then use the method best for you.



#7 Dennis Hilborn

Dennis Hilborn

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts
  • LocationDFW Texas

Posted 04 December 2018 - 12:39 PM

So yes that is the way that I still do it. Main reason why is because it is much faster for me to create all of the details that I want than it is to build it in 3D. Typically I would say that I spend less than 45 minutes creating all of the elevations and details that I need on the exterior. By the time I go through all of the floor plans editing the wall heights and materials and exterior elements that I want to include, I just have not had it at a point where I can do it as quickly. Maybe if I continued to work in the 3D model more often it would come faster over time but that has not been the case for me to get the looks that I have wanted at a fast pace. I am always open to suggestions and changing but this has just been much more efficient for me over time. 

I see your point. 



#8 Brian Berzinskis

Brian Berzinskis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 470 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 02 January 2019 - 12:40 PM

Setting wall heights and beam heights is very simple and not time consuming.  From there you can generate many other things, most notably the roof.  The accuracy is what is important to me in generating elevations.  I also use the model to make sure there are not problems for construction.  I also have to provide "full" framing plans, with proper and actual joists, and rafters, not just call outs..  But if other methods work for getting to the same place, then use the method best for you.

 

I do make the framing plans for the roof and all of the floor plans as well so I would think that it would be easy for me to translate over to the generated elevations but it just has never come out the way that I want and became too time consuming.

 

Out of curiosity, can you share how you do your framing plans? I have been using ceiling mode with labeled joist sets and single joists for the beam design because I can carry over all of the labels like C1, C2 into TrusJoist Forte in order to do all of the sizing. I never understood why we can label beams B1, B2 etc.



#9 Jeffrey Elliott

Jeffrey Elliott

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • LocationNew Palestine, IN

Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:37 PM

Always draw it correctly the first time and from the start.  If drawn properly everything falls into place with Softplan. 


  • Warren Ducote and Rick Kingsbury like this

Jeff Elliott

New Palestine, IN

jeffelliott@me.com

NPI Consulting LLC





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users