Hi everyone, I'm new here and would like to have opinions of ex-Chief Architect users on what makes Softplan a better choice.
I'm a current Revit advanced user, and have grown increasingly frustrated with how long everything takes, and almost zero residential content available OOTB. I've spent probably well over 1,000 hours developing really nice content, and still run into problems that should be a simple solution, but takes a long time of "engineering" to make a family (or what others call symbols). Revit is great if you are doing commercial buildings, or modern residential with flat roofs. Not so much for residential.
Anyways, I've been learning Chief Architect a few hours per week, and so far I like it. I feel it is very easy to use. Although after looking at the features of SoftPlan, I'm still not totally sure Chief is the best software for my needs. Users on forums have all stated that it's better at pretty 3D stuff than construction documents. It is important to me to have all the tools necessary to create highly detailed attractive construction documents, while also showing attractive 3D views and occasional renderings.
I see SoftPlan can export to SketchUp and Lumion, which would solve that if I need to do high-end renderings. In Chief, when creating remodeling project plans, you have to create the existing conditions as a separate plan, and show it as a CAD detail. I'm used to Revit's phase features that allow me to chop up the house as detailed as I want to show existing, demo, and new not only in plans, but in elevations, sections, 3D, ect. Can you do that in SoftPlan with Building Options? Also, has anyone gotten annoyed with always having to right-click to edit anything in SoftPlan? I'm so used to just double clicking in Revit or Chief. Has the file management annoyed anyone, since SoftPlan stores views as separate files? What about SoftTalk? Is that as good as I would think it would be?
SoftPlan has their annual sale, so that is why I'm considering it right now.